• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It may not be the happiest way to go but I think it’s the only self-consistent way to go.

    As an individual I totally believe in making the world a better place, do unto others as that you would have them do unto you, all of that. But in the scenario where the world’s going to end unless one dude sacrifices themselves, I would say basic instinct kicks in. The tribe must survive!

    • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I hope you just pretend that you don’t know what social Darwinism is and how applying it worked out in the end.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m aware of it, and I’ve made no statements along those lines. I think it’s disingenuous to conflate my statements of evolution and the question of one sacrifice for the good of the world, to social Darwinism.

        • gapbetweenus@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Social Darwinism is what you get by applying basic understanding of evolution to moral questions - exactly what you have been doing. It’s really not that complicated. As a moral construct it only leads to suffering since it lacks any empathy.