The plaintiffsā arguments in Moore v. United States have little basis in law ā unless you think that a list of long-ago-discarded laissez-faire decisions from the early 20th century remain good law. And a decision favoring these plaintiffs could blow a huge hole in the federal budget. While no Warren-style wealth tax is on the books, the Moore plaintiffs do challenge an existing tax that is expected to raise $340 billion over the course of a decade.
But Republicans also hold six seats on the nationās highest Court, so there is some risk that a majority of the justices will accept the plaintiffsā dubious legal arguments. And if they do so, they could do considerable damage to the governmentās ability to fund itself.
How so?
Look up dumb dumb. Egomaniacal bullshit, trying to get laughs because you canāt get a W, that sort of thing.
I have no clue what youāre talking about, silly goose.
Thatās pretty obvious.