The plaintiffs’ arguments in Moore v. United States have little basis in law — unless you think that a list of long-ago-discarded laissez-faire decisions from the early 20th century remain good law. And a decision favoring these plaintiffs could blow a huge hole in the federal budget. While no Warren-style wealth tax is on the books, the Moore plaintiffs do challenge an existing tax that is expected to raise $340 billion over the course of a decade.

But Republicans also hold six seats on the nation’s highest Court, so there is some risk that a majority of the justices will accept the plaintiffs’ dubious legal arguments. And if they do so, they could do considerable damage to the government’s ability to fund itself.

  • SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I would hope every single high school graduate could remember the simple pictograph of how communication works:

    • Person A has an idea -
    • Person A encodes the idea and transmits it -
    • Person B receives the transmission and decodes it -
    • Person B has the idea-
    • Reverse the process for feedback and confirmation of idea -

    That encoding bit is pretty important…