• Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah because the majority of blacks use reddit and ebony porn sites. So do you call them ebonies?

    • Pyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not exactly sure what you’re asking, but no, collective nouns aren’t generally pluralized in English, nor is the term appropriate outside of a porn context. Are you a native English speaker?

        • Pyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s far more acceptable than “blacks”. It also avoids the issue of associating general search terms for groups of people with sexualized contexts as has unfortunately been done to Asian women and others.

      • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blacks and whites. Indians and Asians. Look, it’s plural. Add an S, guess it’s dehumanizing? I think the term daddy is dehumanizing. Please, only use dad. Do not add another dy.

        • Pyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, generally referring to groups of people as pluralized adjectives is considered dehumanizing.

          Note that Blacks and the Blacks are both considered offensive and should not be used. Black people is the preferred plural form of Black.

          https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/lcdrg/appendix/black-person

          [A]im to use Black as an adjective, not a noun. Also, when describing a group, use Black people instead of just “Blacks.”

          https://nabjonline.org/news-media-center/styleguide/#styleguidea

          This is for the exact same reason you would not refer to a singular Black person as “a black”. If you still have trouble perceiving the issue, consider how jarring the term “a gay” would seem in print.

          • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say “a black”, context matters no? Everyone thought saying Indian was offensive and came up with native American, until realizing that is more offensive? Just because it’s plural doesn’t make it dehumanizing. Black people says blacks, I don’t hear them say a group of black people.

            • Pyff Daddy@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Are you under the impression that race and nationality are equivalent? If you’re asking whether the term is considered dehumanizing, that’s been answered for you, and if you’re asking why, that’s been answered as well. In English, racial and ethnic terms are generally used as adjectives, and we don’t use adjectives as nouns when referring to groups of people.