A South Korean appellate court on Thursday ordered Japan to compensate a group of 16 women who were forced to work in Japanese wartime brothels, overturning a lower court ruling that dismissed the case and prompting a stern protest from Tokyo.

SEOUL, Nov 23 (Reuters) - A South Korean appellate court on Thursday ordered Japan to compensate a group of 16 women who were forced to work in Japanese wartime brothels, overturning a lower court ruling that dismissed the case and prompting a stern protest from Tokyo.

    • bedrooms@kbin.social
      21·
      11 months ago

      I raised Abe’s name because Abe’s conservative voter base who demanded such a change.

      Get rid of that “this person is not Japanese” attitude. It only humiliates you. Are you a proud nationalist or something?

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        1·
        11 months ago

        If someone references the last well known leader to ask about a country, that’s a giant red flag that they’re lying about being from the country. Same for saying “as far as I understand” to describe the situation in that country. I’m not at all humiliated by not automatically believing someone I don’t know online behaving suspiciously, nor does it imply I’m a nationalist.

        • bedrooms@kbin.social
          1·
          11 months ago

          If someone references the last well known leader to ask about a country, that’s a giant red flag that they’re lying about being from the country

          And you were wrong. Nice try.

            • bedrooms@kbin.social
              1·
              11 months ago

              that’s a giant red flag that they’re lying about being from the country

              A giant red flag that was wrong. Again, nice try.

              • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                1·
                11 months ago

                Red flags are warnings that you should look into further, which I did. They’re not absolute predictors, but signs to probe. I stand by my question.

                You asked someone else in this thread to produce a type of document that has never existed for anything (a government agreement that a word means a certain thing), then when they couldn’t, explained that an argument made without evidence is meaningless. How is due diligence about the claims people make a surprise to you?

                • bedrooms@kbin.social
                  1·
                  11 months ago

                  You asked someone else in this thread to produce a type of document that has never existed for anything (a government agreement that a word means a certain thing)

                  I asked for that document because I suspected it does NOT exist. In a series of trying to prove me wrong, you have only continued to make the wrong assumptions about me. Just stop.

                  • idiomaddict@feddit.de
                    1·
                    11 months ago

                    In a series of trying to prove me wrong you have only continued to make the wrong assumptions.

                    I don’t think you’re wrong and haven’t tried to do anything to prove you wrong. I asked a question, then I’ve explained why I asked it several times, because you’re the one misunderstanding. It’s obvious that you knew that document couldn’t exist. I brought it up to show that asking if the base of someone’s claim is true is in fact, normal on the internet.