California Gov. Gavin Newsomā€™s (D) team slammed Florida Gov. Ron DeSantisā€™ Ā® counterproposal for a debate as a ā€œjokeā€ on Saturday, claiming that the Republican presidential candidateā€™s suggested rules are meant to ā€œhide his insecurity and ineptitude.ā€

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    Besides during COVID, when in modern history did a debate not have an audience? Iā€™ve already commented on the absurdity of the taped intro

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Having an audience in debates is good TV, but itā€™s not good for debates.

      In this case, it will be an especially loaded audience that gives Desantis a marked advantage. Why would Newsoms team agree to that instead of a neutral debate?

        • lone_faerie@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          A debate is supposed to be about discussing important topics to garner support. If the audience is already full of people who support one side or the other, then theyā€™re just there for noise. And we should not be televising a cheering group of Nazis as a reasonable opponent.

    • ickplant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      Ā·
      1 year ago

      A debate with a live audience is stupid. I donā€™t want anyone interrupting the actual debate and I donā€™t need people to clap to know when something good was said. Itā€™s literally just done for entertainment.