Let me preface by saying, I would love to hear counter points and am fully open to the fact that I could be wrong and totally out of touch. I just want to have some dialogue around something thatā€™s been bothering me in the fediverse.

More and more often I keep hearing people refer to ā€œnormiesā€. I think by referring to other people as ā€œnormiesā€, whether you intend to or not, you inadvertently gatekeep and create an exclusive environment rather than an inclusive one in the fediverse.

If I was not that familiar with the fediverse and decided to check it out and the first thing I read was a comment about ā€œnormiesā€, I would quite honestly be very put off. It totally has a negative connotation and doesnā€™t even encapsulate any one group. I just read a comment about someone grouping a racist uncle and funny friend into the same category of normie because they arenā€™t up to date on the fediverse or super tech savvy or whatever.

I donā€™t want to see any Meta bs in the fediverse. I barely want to see half of the stuff from Reddit in the fediverse. I donā€™t want to see the same echo chamber I do everywhere else.

I do want to see more users and more perspectives and a larger user base though. I want to see kindness and compassion. I want to talk to people about topics they are interested in. I want to have relevant discussions without it dissolving into some commentary on some unrelated hot topic thing.

I think calling people normies creates a more toxic, exclusive place which I personally came here to avoid.

Just my two cents! I know for most people using the term it isnā€™t meant to be malicious, but I think it comes off that way.

Love to hear all of your thoughts.

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    Ā·
    1 year ago

    A slur always tells you more about the person who uses it than about the person theyā€™re referring to.

      • nyar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        TERF isnā€™t a slur, itā€™s an accurate descriptor.

        Terfs are trans exclusionary. Terfs are on the borders of feminist thought, making them radical (and not in the cool way).

        They only want it to be a slur so they arenā€™t accurately described as what they are.

        • nuzzlerat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Actually I think it is quite a stretch to call them feminists in any way. 99% of the time they ally with the far right and many of their leaders advocate against things like contraception and healthcare for women

          • Blamemeta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            Ā·
            1 year ago

            Thats more of the term being overused. Only a vanishing small number of people are terfs.

        • Kinglink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          Ā·
          1 year ago

          Yeah but ā€œRadicalā€ā€¦ TERFS ainā€™t radical, nor bodacious nor totally tubular dude!

          Accept everyone, thatā€™s the TMNT way!

      • Peregrinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 year ago

        if terf isnā€™t a slur, Normie isnā€™t either. people seem to get irrationally upset about the word normal. normal is a well defined word, the same way cis is but it seems one group is fine with one whilst the other isnā€™t.

        instead of focusing on labels and how much they upset you (I donā€™t mean who I am replying to), focus on understanding and respecting peopleā€™s differences, regardless of terminology.