Personally, I’m looking forward to native Wayland support for Wine and KDE’s port to Qt 6.

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    from which interesting derivatives will show up.

    I don’t think that will happen and hope it won’t because NixOS can handle the usual preferences people might have internally.

    Don’t like glibc? pkgsMusl is the entire package set but with musl instead of glibc.
    Want static compilation? pkgsStatic.
    Afraid of systemd? Well okay, we don’t have that right now but I don’t think anyone would be opposed to optional support for worse service managers. It’d just be an opt-in toggle that we could support with enough people interested in it.

    • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, people always want to put their own spin on things and I welcome the diversity.

      Arch can bring in all the necessary packages yourself, but Garuda exists and people enjoy using it. Horses for courses.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Garuda only exists because the only way to distribute a set of default configuration in regular distros is to create a whole new distro/installer. We don’t have that problem in NixOS because all configuration is declarative and composable.

        In the NixOS world, Garuda would be a NixOS base config which users would import in their own config and extend with their own configuration. You’d still be using NixOS though.

        • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re packaging enough changes that somebody would say it’s a different experience, calling it the “X configuration” vs “X distribution” based on how it’s packaged is just splitting hairs.