ā€œOf course they did! They may have been the boxes etc. that were openly and plainly brought from the White House, as is my right under the Presidential Records Act,ā€ Trump posted on social media.

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    Ā·
    9 months ago

    If itā€™s a law they have a legal duty, your hedging doesnā€™t particularly make sense.

    legal

    1 of 2

    adjective

    leĀ·ā€‹galĀ Ėˆlē-gəlĀ 

    Synonyms ofĀ legal

    1

    :Ā of or relating to law

    She has manyĀ legalĀ problems.

    2

    a

    :Ā deriving authority from or founded on lawĀ :Ā DE JURE

    aĀ legalĀ government

    b

    :Ā having a formal status derived from law often without a basis in actual factĀ :Ā TITULAR

    a corporation is aĀ legalĀ but not a real person

    c

    :Ā established by law

    especiallyĀ :Ā STATUTORY

    theĀ legalĀ test of mental capacityā€”K. C. Masteller

    3

    :Ā conforming to or permitted by law or established rules

    The referee said it was aĀ legalĀ play.

    Fishing in this lake isĀ legal.

    4

    :Ā recognized or made effective by a court of law as distinguished from a court of equity

    5

    :Ā of, relating to, or having the characteristics of the profession of law or of one of its members

    a bottle ā€¦ that someĀ legalĀ friend had sent himā€”J. G. Cozzens

    6

    :Ā created by the constructions of the law

    AĀ legalĀ fiction is something assumed in law to be a fact regardless of the truth of that assumption.

    legal

    2 of 2

    noun

    :Ā one that conforms to rules or the law

    • roguetrick@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      Ā·
      9 months ago

      Iā€™m not getting into semantics, Iā€™m talking about the original post I replied to, namely

      he has a clear duty to protect their secrecy

      Which is talking about a duty in derived sense, not a codified duty.

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        Ā·
        9 months ago

        He does, nothing youā€™ve offered implies or states otherwise.

        No, it has to do with a law or rather a series of them an oath to office and an oath to maintain national secrets.

        • roguetrick@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          Ā·
          9 months ago

          Thatā€™s the definition of a derived duty, and it isnā€™t what Iā€™d call ā€œlaw.ā€

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            Ā·
            9 months ago

            18 usc 1924 Is a law that created a duty, a legal duty.

            (a)

            Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containingĀ classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

            You say you donā€™t want to play semantics but thatā€™s your entire argument.

            • roguetrick@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              Ā·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You actually donā€™t understand my argument. What youā€™re talking about now is WHY I think trump broke the law. It has nothing to do with oaths of office. Oaths of office do NOT create a legal duty. That code, as well as the administrative law around

              without authority

              from that code is what creates a legal duty.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                Ā·
                9 months ago

                I understand your argument, donā€™t be patronizing.

                No I donā€™t care what you think about Trump or if he broke the law.

                It does, you swear to follow the law they make you take it specifically so they can increase penalties, it quite literally increases legal responsibility.