• Catarinalina@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    No need for the \s. That is literally how they did this “study”. I’d be interested to see who it was that paid for this bullshit, wouldn’t be surprised to see the money trail leading back to commercial real estate.

    The article boasts the headline front and center % productivity loss, as though this was some years long extensive study. The section of the report discussing these results is less than two paragraphs long. I’ve seen high school students put together a more detailed a well researched study.

    What bothers me the most is that people will readily reference this article and spread this bullshit everywhere, with basically no one having read the study or put any critical thinking into this at all.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ouch you are right, people will see headlines and slowly stop being so sure…

      And yeah, to find the criminal, follow the money.