• BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    We test them when they’re actually ready to be tested. These are clearly not even ready for animal based testing, let alone human testing.

    These devices are so far from ready they shouldn’t even be near a living animal

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Do you have insider knowledge on these technologies? How do you know it wasn’t ready? Do you think they would be at human trials if it wasn’t ready a year ago for animal testing.

      My point anyways is that we shouldn’t be doing any testing for things like mascara, but brain computer interfaces are a valid reason.

      Regardless, we do worse for things that are a lot less warranted than this. Your phone has inhumane treatment of actual humans written all over it. Your whole 1st world luxury life screams of sin but you waste your time getting mad on things that could bring about great benefit just because of a name associated with it.

      Keep screaming about it, chimp.

      • BURN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nearly every test subject died. That’s pretty clearly not ready. Don’t need insider information to know that killing the majority of your test subjects means your product isn’t ready for the next stage of testing, rather it’s ready to go back to the drawing board and start over with something that won’t kill all its subjects.

        Now you’re just being racist.