Uber CEO balks after a reporter tells him the cost of his 2.9-mile Uber ride: ‘Oh my God. Wow.’::undefined

  • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bear in mind this was in Manhattan, one of the most transit oriented places in the world. You could go that distance by subway for $2.75, 24 hours a day. Either the journalist was being stupid, or overlaps more likely, wanted to prove a point.

    • 1bluepixel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      NYC might be the most “transit-oriented” city in America, but in the world? Not then close. Not by a mile.

      Most big cities in Europe have a mix of buses, subways, and trams that make taking public transport a no-brainer. That includes Eastern Europe, too. That’s also true of any big city in China, Korea, and Japan.

      • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        What makes you say that New York doesn’t have that, most of the city is well served by rapid transit. And I was talking about Manhattan specifically, which is one of the most transit dense places in the world, even if you leave out local buses and just stick to subway and BRT, you can basically get anywhere in the borough. Yeah, parts of the outer boroughs lack frequent transit (especially SI),but most NYers don’t drive, sticking to trains and the occasional taxi. If New York isn’t transit oriented, I don’t know what is.

    • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      You are totally right, but all the downvotes show how biased Lemmy is.

      Also you clearly wrote “one of…” not THE most transit oriented places in the world, and yet the other person clearly missed that part.