• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think fediverse servers should adopt a set of sustainable limits for themselves, one of which should be: do not maintain more than X active users. If they have over that amount, they should shut down signups. If they don’t shut down signups, everyone else should defederate them until they cooperate.

  • Ciren@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s with all the hate about federating with Threads? I thought people would be happy to hear a big player is coming to the fediverse that’s going to bring a bunch of people with it. “Normies” will probably never use Mastodon or Lemmy but might use Threads, so being able to communicate with them while staying on my little community-ran Mastodon instance is a win for the fediverse in my book. And if somebody’s annoying or whatever, you can always block them, right? Can somebody clarify why people think everyone should automatically defederate with them and lose such a big userbase? I mean, I hate Facebook/Meta as much as the next guy, but more users are more users…

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly one needs to look at the economic ensentives in order to understand metas goals.

    Meta does not make any money from content on the federverse. Therefore, they have no reason to support its growth or future. In fact I would go as far as to say that they actually are going to try and EEE.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      They aren’t going to try to EEE. ActivityPub was just an easy protocall to build off of quickly. They don’t care about the fediverse. They have almost zero incentive to waste effort trying to destroy it, plus it’s open source, so worst case we just fork it and move on.

      • hikaru755@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        ActivityPub was just an easy protocall to build off of quickly

        If they didn’t want to federate, they wouldnt have a need for ActivityPub or any kind of similar protocol.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          EEE means embrace, extend, extenguish. It’s to say they’ll start using it, extend it so they are required to continue using it, then stop supporting it or actively kill it. It has nothing to do with federation, whether they do or don’t.

          • hikaru755@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know that, but if that’s not the goal, then what else do they hope to achieve by implementing ActivityPub? It means they plan to federate with the larger fediverse, and you can bet that there’s a carefully calculated business reasoning behind it.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They likely used it because most of the work is already done. They could quickly turn around a new app as they notice Twitter fucking up, rather than starting from scratch. It already exists, works, and is tested.

    • nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Fucking Mastodon

      Fosstodon had the balls to not sell out

      Also Meta has not federated yet but said they will in the future so any “defederation” from instances is just a declaration of future plans since there is nothing to cut off yet