• hh93@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another circlejerk article for Europe with a hypothetical scenario as an opinion piece just to get people angry. Seems weird that something like this is coming from Reuters - I thought they did mostly matter of fact reporting for things that happened and not stuff like this

    • Murvel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s an article with listed facts, graphs, and data you fucking dullard, just read the damn article.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It says “Commentary” right on top. That means it is a comment and not an analysis. So maybe just read the damn commentary, before starting to insult people.

        • Murvel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wtf difference does thst make?! Do you think the facts and sources are nullified since it’s labeled a commentary?

          • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The facts are basicly everything that happend in the past, as that can be measured. Everything about the future is just a comment from the author. It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.

            So if you actually care for the facts, it is that since Germany stopped its nuclear power plants Germany is producing less fossil fuel electricity. That graph comes straight from the Reuters piece. The question is if it continues that way and that is still open.

            • Murvel@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              And the Reuters article says it most likely won’t and will be substituted with fossil fuel! And by going by that argumentation, I’m surprised you’re not suggesting climate change is just speculation since it’s all based on models and predictions

              • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                Again, can you read?

                It is not a study or a model, but just a comment from some reporter at Reuters.