realitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agobut idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1987arrow-down115
arrow-up1972arrow-down1imagebut idk tholemmy.worldrealitista@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square0ops@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months agoWell only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYA@lemmyfi.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·9 months agoYou can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoLet’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
minus-squareALostInquirer@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·9 months agoWhere might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
minus-squaretetris11@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-29 months agoTheoretically, I had underetood the opposite.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.