Highlights: The vote was something of a surprise: Tlaib, a staunch liberal who’s been harshly critical of Israel, has few fans in the GOP when it comes to Middle Eastern politics. It’s unclear why several Republicans came to her rescue during Wednesday’s vote.

The censure resolution — sponsored by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — had accused Tlaib of “leading an insurrection” for her participation in an anti-war protest last month at the Capitol, organized by Jewish groups, which featured scores of arrests.

Pro-Israel Democrats, who might have been inclined to censure Tlaib’s comments, had hammered Greene for her inaccurate characterization of a peace protest — albeit a rowdy one — and for sensationalizing Tlaib’s role in orchestrating it. They were also leery that Greene’s “insurrectionist” language had trivialized the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of former President Trump.

  • flying_monkies@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — had accused Tlaib of “leading an insurrection”

    I know Margie is as dumb as the day is long, but did she really forget what leading an insurrection actually looks like already?

    • Odelay42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, she intentionally used this language to dilute the impact of the actual, real, attempted insurrection on Jan 6. She’s trying to normalize the phrase so people don’t associate the word with violently storming the capitol trying to hang the vice president.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        9 months ago

        Just like how Trump has started calling the January 6th insurrectionists that were sentenced to jail “the J6 Hostages.” It’s meant to both evoke images of people being wrongly held against their will by an evil group and to trivialize the word “hostage.”

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep, they’ve been calling every protest at the Capitol an insurrection, so they can lump Jan 6th into the bucket of ‘protests at the Capitol’, which are basically a weekly occurrence that typically don’t even make the news.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          The president amplifying all the incredible stupid shit she says would be the worst possible politcal move.

          Its a good thing we have a strong president who doesnt use his bully pulpit to respond to petty and stupid bullshit all day.

            • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              You think the president of the united states, the head of the executive branch and the military, who makes endless decisions that directly steer our nation all day long, should directly and overly concern himself with a single lunatic house member who endorsed qanon and jewish space lasers? A person whose brand is based on high profile conflict? The president should ignore his duties to engage with her, to directly empower and boost her brand with her base, for what possible gain?

              No, it’s not his job at all to slap down an errant house member. Im sure his press secretary has many times though, as dealing with lunatic comments is part of their direct role. Why havent you prasied them for their work handling her?

                • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Y’all really want the president to argue with every crazy motherfucker that wants his spotlight, huh?

                  Shouldn’t he be doing a sit down with Tucker Carlson, go on Bannons podcast? Hit up the OAN circuit? Maybe go on some “skeptic” YouTuber channels? They are all crazy terrorist supporters, so he needs to go toe to toe with them nonstop too, right?

                  MTG is a piece of shit that got her start in politics by stalking and harrasing the parkland survivors. Engaging with her is exactly what gives her power. Why are you so insistent the most powerful person on earth, who has way more fucking important things to do than argue with loons, go and give her his spotlight?

    • RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      Isn’t this the Karl Rove strategy? Accuse your opponents of the things that you’re guilty of so it muddies the waters if they accuse you?

  • dhork@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    9 months ago

    This came up at the same time that Grand Moff Santos’s expulsion came up. I bet there was some horse trading to ensure neither motion got a majority.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I doubt it. Censure is basically meaningless. Nowhere near getting kicked out of Congress. There’s no point in deal making for it, since it’s symbolic

    • Melkath@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      49
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The damage Hilary did to the Democrat party will only worsten until they self correct back from progressivism to liberalism.

  • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    The GOP is becoming irrelevant and some of their reps actually might give a fuck about how things are going.

    Where this optimism comes from, I have no idea

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    House lawmakers voted Wednesday to torpedo a resolution censuring Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) for her harsh criticisms of Israel in the wake of Hamas’s deadly attacks last month.

    The censure resolution — sponsored by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) — had accused Tlaib of “leading an insurrection” for her participation in an anti-war protest last month at the Capitol, organized by Jewish groups, which featured scores of arrests.

    Greene’s three-page censure resolution charged Tlaib with “antisemitic activity” and “sympathizing with terrorist organizations.” It listed a number of Tlaib’s criticisms of Israel in recent years, the most recent being a statement she released one day after Hamas’s attack on Israel that called for “lifting the blockade, ending the occupation, and dismantling the apartheid system that creates the suffocating, dehumanizing conditions that can lead to resistance.”

    Greene last week moved to force a vote on the censure resolution, a rarely used procedural gambit that compelled leadership — under the helm of newly minted Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)

    That new trend was on full display last week, when first-term Rep. Becca Balint (D-Vt.) moved to force a vote on a resolution censuring Greene shortly after the Georgia Republican did the same for her legislation penalizing Tlaib.

    “The fact that on the very first day of his leadership, he lets Marjorie Taylor Greene bring to the floor a resolution that is riddled with lies and falsehoods on my colleague, it won’t stand,” Balint told reporters last week.


    The original article contains 906 words, the summary contains 240 words. Saved 74%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!