• VelvetGentleman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      !It does not matter how Christ behaved – what He taught is all that matters!<

      Are you telling me you’ve read a more fucked up sentence than that? This guy was fucking nuts.

      Spoiler tag for the squeamish.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Christ taught that we should be good to each other.

        Christ flipped over tables in a rage and cursed a fig tree because he had the munchies.

        I think I agree. Christ was kinda immature. Good message though.

      • howsetheraven@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are like 30 other sentences that are more fucked up just in that article. What is so awful about that for you?

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        “I look upon God no better than a scoundrel”

        Seems spot on. God created universe. Creates hell as ETERNAL punishment. Creates rules on how to get into hell. Creates humans knowing many will do to hell.

        God is a soulless cunt. Or he would be, if any of the above made any kind of sense.

        • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Again, that’s a common opinion for a circlejerking atheist Internet forum. It’s not at all an acceptable position for a cleric of the Church.

          Luther was a priest who presumed to correct the Christian Church on matters of the faith. He sounds like a fifteen year old neckbeard who has his head squarely ensconced in his own ass.

          • testfactor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            11 months ago

            To be fair, one of the big things he “presumed to correct” the church on was indulgences, which I think even the Catholic Church is now like, “yeah, that was bad…”

            • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Sure, and I never argued otherwise. The fact that he was able to point out an obviously unjust and despicable practice doesn’t detract from his horrible and unconscionable teachings on other subjects.

              • protist@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                11 months ago

                But how do his teachings compare to others of the time, especially the Catholic Church? If you try to apply 21st Century morality to 16th Century ideas, you are bound to find ideas to consider “unconscionable.” People at large did some absolutely fucked up shit in the past, but in their times much of what they did was a societal norm

                • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Other people also having fucked up opinions at the time also don’t justify the truly fucked up opinions and teachings of one specific person.

                  • protist@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    The social norms and cultural context of the time absolutely matter when you’re reviewing history