• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Comments saying “You don’t have to self-censor here” and downvotes when you do so are a signal. If the downvotes bother you, you can edit your comment. If they don’t bother you enough for you to make such a small effort, then it shouldn’t matter because downvotes don’t do anything - they don’t reduce visibility to your comment and Lemmy doesn’t have a karma system.

    If someone else who would’ve done the same thing sees the downvotes and the comments chiding you, then optimally they’ll realize they shouldn’t do the same thing in the future.

    Which part of this do you think is a problem?

    • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The promotion of assuming motivation is the problem. The judgement for a benign action is the problem.

      If you say, “downvoting is benign” then I say: Pay attention to first offense. Responding negatively to negative stimulus is INFINITELY more justifiable than spontaneously creating negativity, like judging someone harshly for simply using an * instead of a normal character.

      You should not be more angry at the person angrily defending someone from judgemental dumbasses than the judgemental dumbasses, unless you yourself are a judgemental dumbass.

      Don’t be the prick defending hateful behavior just because you’d do it too. That’s, “it’s just a prank, bro!” levels of being an uncaring piece of shit.