I’ve recently been made aware of the non-sustainable business of Spotify (and other streaming services) https://youtu.be/gDfNRWsMRsU .

I think the best solution for all parties would be a federated streaming service. Instances could be hosted by record labels or indi-Artists. Of course there needs to be a fair donation/subscription. (Maybe similar to Patreon - get some extra goodies for supporting your artist directly)

Does something similar exist already? I would rather put my money somewhere where small artists are actually paid fairly for their work. (And put my own works there as well)

Thanks for reading :) I wish you a very pleasant day and I’m looking forward for your input.

    • Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I looked at it, but got kinda confused. The instance I logged in didn’t seem to share any music with other instances.

    • aleph@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obligatory mention of Bandcamp and Qobuz here - buying music outright ensures a much bigger payout for the artists.

    • Salix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, not everyone can afford that. Spotify family plan is significantly cheaper than buying every single album from every artist I and my family listens to. Just for myself, I’d have to spend $5000+ for the amount of music I listen to if I bought the mp3 or flac files.

      • Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great point. While I don’t think streaming services can uphold their low prices (and I’m also happy to pay 20 bucks when the artists gets a fair share) I think buying all albums you maybe wanna listen to is way to expensive. Buying music also raises the barrier to discovering new music and cultivatinng a diverse taste in music.

    • Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that it’s a great way to support your artist, but honestly I don’t think it stands a chance to become as big as streaming services. The convince of being able to explore almost every artists catalogue at the touch of a button is just too good. (Also great for sharing music or creating a shared playlist)

      I think the problem of storage space is also often overlooked. Not everyone has enough storage on their device. (I know I didn’t, when I still used MP3s on a modern smartphone)

  • Navarian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I worry that something like this would rapidly become the equivalent of paying for a hundred different shitty TV channels from cable TV so that you could get the few good ones you were actually interested in.

    • Lennard@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess that’s a possibility. But I think most artists want their work (at least their studio records) to be available to as many listeners as possible. I think paywalling most content will not be successful for the artist nor the record label. (The same way exclusivity deals with streaming services haven’t really worked out).

      But I wouldn’t really mind paying 1 dollar per artist for some bonus tracks, when I know that when 6000 people do the same they will be able to succeed financially