Highlights: In a bizarre turn of events last month, UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced that he would ban American XL bullies, a type of pit bull-shaped dog that had recently been implicated in a number of violent and sometimes deadly attacks.

XL bullies are perceived to be dangerous — but is that really rooted in reality?

  • hiddengoat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ooh look, you’re partway there.

    Now do some more reading on how many dogs that is, what percentage of the population other breeds account for, and what percentage of pit bulls are responsible for fatal injuries vs what percentage of other breeds are responsible for fatal injuries.

    And then, to actually make it even, separate the pit bull breeds into their individual actual breeds. You did know there were several breeds considered pit bulls, right?

    https://www.pitbullinfo.org/inaccurate-pit-bull-statistics.html

    100% FAlse: “Pitbulls” account for around 65% of fatal dog attacks
    This statistic is derived from grouping together all dog bite-related incidents for the four unique pitbull-type breeds, 20+ bully-type breeds (and their many mixes) that are frequently misidentified as one of the pitbull-type breeds, and the many different mixed breed dogs that can be mislabeled as “pitbulls” (based on their appearance) into one bucket and classifying all of these dogs as “pitbulls” - which will undoubtedly lead to flawed and inflated “statistics”.

    What you find is that PER CAPITA pit bull breeds are not significant outliers when it comes to fatal injuries or attacks. They are similar to other breeds that nobody gives a shit about like rottweilers, dobermans, German shepherds, and other common breeds you can find anywhere that pit bull haters live.

    Black people Pit bulls are only X% of dogs but account for Y% of crime fatal injuries!”

    Stop me if you’ve heard that one. It tends to come from the same type of person.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t bring racism into this, this has nothing to do with racism or people.

      And yes, per capita pitbulls do account for far more fatal attacks compared to other breeds.

      And my goodness, you’re actually linking to pitbullinfo, hahahaha. I already did a full teardown of that idiotic site, and its inability to actually read scientific papers with another lemmier. It’s such a massive crap pile of propaganda, trying to disguise itself as a reliable source.

      Every paper they list in their sources either doesn’t say what they claim it does, or says literally the exact opposite. It’s hilarious how bad that site is, and I can’t believe anyone falls for it.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Breed specific bans are about racism.

        I recall one advocate I think from New Jersey who said the quiet part out loud about banning pitbulls: “we just don’t want these kind of people around here.”

        Hmmm.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          All the pitbulls I know are owned by white people. I still want that shit breed banned.

          It’s not about race, pitbulls are shit dogs and should no longer be bred.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You seem like a shit person to be totally honest. Pretty much everyone I know did a book report on this subject in the 5th grade and realize how fucking dumb breed restrictions were. I guess you were sick that day.

            • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because I think the breed responsible for the vast majority of fatal dog attacks is a shit breed?

              I think you’re a shit person for supporting such a shit breed.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                No it’s because you never learned to read, if you had, you’d know how stupid you sound talking about dog bite statistics when in over half of all reported cases the breed is unknown, and in the less than half of cases that the breed is reported, it is self reported by people who are not trained to make visual identifications of dog breeds, and even the people who are trained usually get it wrong, because dog breeds usually cannot be identified visually with any sort of accuracy. So you see, you’re an abject moron who obviously cannot read.

                • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Nope, that’s just the pitbull propaganda trying to make the shit breed look better.

                  Pits were bred to fight and kill other dogs. They are aggressive terriers with a strong prey drive, and they have the physical strength to kill people. That is a bad, and dangerous combination, and the shit breed needs to be done away with.