See title

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Again, that’s not what my point is. I’m just disputing the characterization you made

    Edit: every reply from the above commenter gets 5 upvotes in 2 minutes, while all my comments get 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… nice job being subtle

      • jeffw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The comment called the authors “kooks.” I am disputing that characterization. As you say, this has nothing to do with the study.

        Edit: 5 downvotes in 2 minutes… wow, is this breaking any rules that the person has so many accounts and manipulates votes?

          • jeffw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I apologize if my comment was not clear. You’re correct, just posting a link is not sufficient. However, the lead author, Gordon Gallup Jr, created the mirror test (see https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/neuroscience/mirror-test#:~:text=A concept of self has,differentiate themselves from other individuals.)

            His work is pretty vital in our understanding or primate cognition. See his recent paper for an update: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-57425-001

            A quick google search gives look as: “a crazy or eccentric person.” He probably is quite eccentric, but I’d say “crazy” is a bit much. Merrimack Webster uses “one whose ideas or actions are eccentric, fantastic, or insane.” Feel free to share why you specifically think his writing demonstrates insanity

            Edit: 5 downvotes in 2 minutes again, to nobody’s surprise

            • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              so, after citing other works which have no bearing whatsoever on this one, you agree that he’s kooky.

              are you trolling for any particular reason or just because you’re bored?

              • jeffw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry, as I’ve stated from the beginning, this work is most likely not accurate. However, I don’t think exploring odd theories makes someone a “kook,” no. He’s a scientist exploring and publishing a review of the research.

                Again, your comment stated that the authors are kooks. I stated the lead author is quite respected and then provided evidence backing my comment. Again, if you have specific evidence or quotes as to why you think this man is crazy, I’m all ears.

                • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Again, your comment stated that the authors are kooks.

                  Again, if you have specific evidence or quotes as to why you think this man is crazy, I’m all ears.

                  ah, I’ve identified the problem-- either you’re illiterate, or you think I’m stupid enough to be distracted by your obvious trolling to notice you’re trying to put words in my mouth.

                  enough with the Sealioning

                  Sealioning (also sea-lioning and sea lioning) is a type of trolling or harassment that consists of pursuing people with relentless requests for evidence, often tangential or previously addressed, while maintaining a pretense of civility and sincerity (“I’m just trying to have a debate”), and feigning ignorance of the subject matter. It may take the form of “incessant, bad-faith invitations to engage in debate”, and has been likened to a denial-of-service attack targeted at human beings. The term originated with a 2014 strip of the webcomic Wondermark by David Malki, which The Independent called “the most apt description of Twitter you’ll ever see”.

                  • jeffw@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    so you just found some crazy study online by some academic kooks and, rather than apply an ounce of critical thought, you just believed it.

                    My apologies again. What does “academic kooks” mean to you?