Yet again the Internet Archiving is suffering big this time, a coalition of major record labels filed a lawsuit against the Internet Archive demanding $700 million for the extensive catalog of 78 rpm records. 78s are sometimes more than a century old at this point and i bet a lot of them are out of copyright, but i suppose for the few that still are majors are hitting it big towards the IA

This lawsuit is pretty much another existential threat to the Internet Archive and everything it preserves, including the Wayback Machine, and we’re fucked if we ever lose access to the Wayback Machine.

the original article asked to sign a petition, but i think a more logical way to support is to donate them directly so that they have more money to better defend themselves in court in this and other cases they’ll undoubtedly face in the future

  • troed@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    16 hours ago

    They lost that argument when they implemented the possibility to play games they host in the browser.

    I’m all for an archive. I’m not sure IA are doing this right.

    • Neko the gamer@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      but come on, it’s not like they’re modern videogames or something, they’re old stuff from the 80s and 90s that one would never be able to play without access to the original hardware, so even in that case it’s about preserving the media, not committing plain copyright infringement to the original game publisher or something

      • troed@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        13 hours ago

        They can be archived without being playable - and many of them are definitely still sold today and playable through commercial emulation. Playing PSX (Playstation 1) games is part of Sony’s Playstation Premium subscription as an example - and Nintendo has the same.

        Completely unnecessary, and puts the actual archiving arguments at risk meaning we might see court action that makes it impossible for other “real” archives to exist.

        • datavoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          Arguing that subscription services should be the only way to experience 30+ year old media that you may have already purchased is certainly one view… I don’t think you’ll find much support here, however

        • MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          They can be archived without being playable

          You mustn’t be afraid to dream a little bigger darling.

          Imagine an archive for unreadable books, unwatchable films, and unplayable games too!

          • troed@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I think you forgot commenting the part about your “never be able to” statement being a flat out lie.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      15 hours ago

      They acted like a regplar library: only one person was able to play concurrently. If that’s not ok, then all libraries should get sued.