Summary

Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) traveled to El Salvador to seek the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident wrongfully deported in March.

Abrego Garcia, married to a U.S. citizen with three children, was legally allowed to stay under a 2019 court order.

The Trump administration admitted his deportation was an “administrative error” but refused his return. The Supreme Court ruled against the administration 9-0.

In response, the White House launched a smear campaign against Van Hollen, framing Garcia as a gang member despite no charges or convictions.

  • libertyforever@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    2 days ago

    SCOTUS didn’t order his return. The ruling was that this is a foreign policy matter at this point and the executive branch has foreign policy power, not the court. SCOTUS rule that the Trump administration has to facilitate his return. Trump is willing to facilitate his return, but El Salvador said no, and that is the end of discussion for this matter.

    Anyway, it would be ridiculously weird for El Salvador to send their own citizen to the US who initiated came to the US illegally.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      There’s mischaracterisations, and then there’s just flat-out lies. You’re telling the latter.

      (also, the sheer fucking irony of naming yourself “libertyforever” while cheerleading a system of life imprisonment without trial)

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      The whole reason you put concentration camps in a foreign nation is to remove them from SCOTUS jurisdiction. Then you get to sit back and say, “We can’t compel a sovereign state,” while the sovereign state gets to sit back and say, “We’d gladly return these people, if only POTUS would ask.” Just one capo doing a favor for a fellow capo, somehow neither one of them able to do the right thing.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        You want to talk about concentration camps? We’re already expanding our own Black Site.

        America has the highest incarceration rate in the world. The average maximum security prison holds 800-1200 prisoners. The largest, Angola, LA, holds over 8000.

        Our most famous black site, Guantanamo Bay, located in CUBA (WTF?), currently holds about 120. They are now building a facility there, that will hold 30,000 prisoners. That’s nearly 4 times our largest prison, which is already about 8 times larger than average.

        The question is: Who do they intend to put in that new facility, which is far from any oversight by the media or the courts. It’s in fucking Cuba, which is controlled by…well, you get it.

        • tburkhol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Gitmo is expensive, like $10M/prisoner/year expensive, and still at least nominally subject to US laws, though watered down by being a military facility. Outsourcing to El Salvador gets them massive cost savings and complete liberation from judicial oversight. They may still work on Gitmo, but I expect El Salvador to be the go-to camp now. Discount Gitmo. All they have to do is get you there - get you in the air to there - and you become a stateless, rights-less slave.

          • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            I suspect Gitmo will be reserved for the high profile prisoners that would cause too much outcry - celebrities, elected politicians, wealthy resistors, etc. The ones they don’t care about will go to El Salvador.

      • libertyforever@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        2 days ago

        It was an administrative error. There is a valid deportation order for that man. There is also a withholding order which only applies to El Salvador. The only mistake in the deportation was the destination.

        • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          ICE already admitted the man was deported in error. So why are you making up stuff? These facts are easy to check, I can only assume you’re either a troll or a foreign agitator.

        • Mcdolan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Do you have some sources for this? There’s so much emotional baggage with this its hard to get to the facts.

          In my mind saying the only mistake is the destination Is an incredible understatement.
          “The only issue with your heart transplant is we had a paperwork mixup and replaced your liver instead.”

          “I know you came in for just a vehicle safety inspection but our mechanics messed up and replaced your engine, here’s the bill.”

          “We had a mix up at the hospital and the child you’ve raised for 3 years isn’t actually yours. Our bad, but there’s nothing we can do to fix it and there’s nothing we’re going to do to prevent it in the future. Good luck!”

          Don’t downplay this shit and fall into dehumanizing others because they must have done something to deserve the position they are in. Don’t lose sight of empathy. Try pretending it’s a loved of yours. If one of mine fucked up and deserve punishment then fine, but there better be a fair trial and they deserve their chance to prove their innocence.

          • libertyforever@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            2 days ago

            There is a valid and effective deportation order. For deportation purpose, there was no need to prove him guilty at the criminal court. If he was deported to another country, this would be completely in compliance.

            You need to provide me exactly what you disagree with. Doesn’t make sense for me to provide you sources for every fact in this matter.

            • Mcdolan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              They’ve admitted there was an error, and are not being transparent in the extent of the error nor are they trying to correct the error. I dispute every fact in this matter because the main source I believe you are using are the people at fault for it. They aren’t even doing the common curtsey of an “internal investigation” reach around that typical police do after they’ve fuck us.

              It doesn’t make sense that you wouldn’t throw out a couple random sources to your claims since it’s cut and dry in your mind. Show me the valid deportation order. Show me the evidence they used to forgo immigration court (why the fuck would he be in criminal court?) to have an expidited removal to a place a previous court said he could not go.

              It’s easy to prove us stupid ass sheeple wrong, fucking do it…