It’s kind of funny how this blog post seems to use the same exact slop-ass language the post it’s complaining about does. Well and truly dead and barren, most of the internet is.

Slop or not, it does happen so often now that it does not feel like it’s worth it going online, but it’s worth sharing, I guess, gah.

  • bulwark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 days ago

    The author of that article seems real and makes a decent point. Reddit is infested with that shit nowadays.

    There’s tells I’ve noticed that if something seems to friendly, or formal, and the tone seems too verbose it might be generated. Formatting gives it away as well

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      How does formatting give it away?

      I’ve honestly struggled a lot trying to figure out what posts are just chatbot trolls and what posts are people worth trying to create a dialogue with.

      I mean, sometimes posts will say things that seem like they’re intentionally misleading or inherently malicious in some way and it’s like… Is this person for real? Are they trying to push some specific narrative? Or are they just misinformed? Or is this just a chatbot designed to upset people and disrupt online conversations on this subject?

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I’ve noticed they often hedge pretty bad at the end and give some boilerplate “Always rely on professionals or this credential or whatever platitude to avoid bring percrived as giving risky or dealing casually with taboo topic matter”

        YMMV and be sure to consult with your real, friendly neighorhood LLM to balance your understanding and expectations therin