Overall, 39% of U.S. adults say they are “extremely proud” to be American in the most recent poll.

Meanwhile, only 18% of those aged 18-34 said the same, compared to 40% of those aged 35-54 and 50% of those 55 and over.

18% is still too high. As Obama’s pastor said, God damn America! Americans have very little to be proud of at this point.

  • Copernican@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Old and new left isn’t an age thing. And Rorty writing about the new left was writing against themes observed in mature boomers of the 90s, using Snow Crash as example of new left fiction. I think that view is more present in young people today, but old and new left is not meant to imply young vs old generational divides.

    • Johnny5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The recrimination goes both ways is my point, and is to the detriment of both

        • Johnny5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With identity politics, it seems even worsened that the new left cares about ideological purity and sin which prevents coalition type movements.

          This critique is pervasive and has always rung hollow to me when trying to navigate this divide. The onus is also on the old left to build bridges imho

          • Copernican@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The old left, as Rorty describes, is the leftist group that demonstrates the willingness to build bridges. In Achieving Our Country he provides accounts or examples of willingness and trust to create precarious political movements with groups that do not have 100% alignment or common views on all issues to effect change. This requires compromise, pluralism, and willingness to collaborate with people that may have some viewpoints you disagree with in order to achieve common goods.

            And again, I am not saying old left and new left is a generational distinction. There are plenty of young folks that fall into the old progressive left category. This article highlights that “18% of those aged 18-34 said the same [of being proud of country].”

            Also took some time to open the book again, I think the terms he used were “Cultural Left” and “Progressive Left” but the description was the cultural left was a relatively newer position in Leftist politics. That newness of the cultural left had a lot do with response to things like the Vietnam war that were widely televised, and works by intellectuals like Michel Foucault that impacted how people reflect on their culture. Rorty’s heroes of the progressive left go back to Walt Whitman, John Dewey, James Baldwin. The Baldwin quote he borrows the book title from “If we- and now I mean the relatively conscious whites and the relatively conscious blacks, who must, like lovers, insist on, or create, the consciousness of the others- do not falter in our duty now, we may be able, handful that we are, to end the racial nightmare, and achieve our country, and change the history of the world.”

            • Johnny5@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I know that’s the argument but Framing it as ‘the new folks on the block don’t want to build bridges’ isn’t a very good way to build bridges.

              Basically I think this whole analysis is a lazy way to dismiss the new left. Not that they’re perfect or anything, but I think there is an equal responsibility for both groups to work together.

              • Copernican@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s the point. The Cultural Critical left in Rorty is characterized as the spectator engaging in cultural commentary (which may be insightful), but do little in terms of action. A theme in spectatorial left is often a sense or POV of a country being beyond repair. The Progressive left is what attempts to be side of action. It’s love of country and national pride that instill a sense of duty to navigate paths of change and national improvement. If you are working towards reform you would be categorized and have that degree of social left, you are more inline with the old left or progressive left. The whole point is the “group” of new left or cultural left are those commentators that do little to enact change or hope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achieving_Our_Country

                • Johnny5@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Idk Still sounds to me like this is mostly a clever way to denigrate and dismiss people who aren’t doing things the “right” way.

                  And I also don’t buy that patriotic duty is the only motivation to work on improving things

                  But if it works for you then good on ya