it’s like you believe you can tariff them expecting they won’t do the same. Why do you believe the rest of the world is not going to retaliate and why do you believe America can prosper without the rest of the world?

What’s the point of having a military alliance with countries you puts tariffs on? That’s unfriendly to say the least.

  • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t think there is any way to bring back those jobs. You guys are dreaming if you think you can just go back to an economy of the past.

    The world has globalized, America can’t just pretend it hasn’t. Sure you can try and bring everything in house but by alienating allies there are lots of things you just can’t get yourselves like many raw materials, and then you need to worry about exporting to actually bring money into your economy not just move it around in circles.

    • Adulated_Aspersion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Plus, think about the logistics of that.

      Goods produced in the US are categorically more expensive due to infrastructure, cost of living (and therefore wage expectations). If we could wave a magic wand to transplant an effective manufacturing facility from Pakistan and place it in rural Mississippi, hire Americans to do the work, and begin pumping out goods, the price to produce the goods would increase substantially.

      Americans wouldn’t be able to afford American made goods, which is true even now. Many Americans try to buy American “when possible”, but cost quickly outweighs patriotism.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Your last paragraph is completely off course and backwards. Americans can’t afford American made goods precisely because of the outsourcing.

        We’re proposing the Henry Ford model of paying your workers enough to be able to afford your products.

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I agree with your position, but I’m struggling to reconcile that with the western push for war with global superpowers.

      The pandemic temporarily crippled our economy with an interruption in shipping from China. How the hell are we planning to survive a hot war with China over Taiwan? They could defeat us without firing a single shot, by just refusing to ship here.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        China also doesn’t want to interrupt trade, it benefits them just as much as America, that’s how. They won’t invade Taiwan if there’s a threat of war disrupting trade.

        If you isolate the country from China too much then there is no benefit to China not invading. Globalization encourages peace because trade benefits all. Russia is suffering from all their sanctions now, they made a mistake thinking things would be over in a few days and people would get over it. Now they need to grit their teeth and pull through it. No one else wants to be Russia.

        • Trumble@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Why wouldn’t China do exactly the same mistake in some point?

          As European I would advice against the trust that the strong economic ties would keep totalitarians in check.

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          But China is much better positioned to outlast us during any interruption in trade for the same reason Russia has survived sanctions. They have the local production capacity and access to vast mineral & resource wealth that we can’t match.

          • PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Do they? As much as we like to play it quiet, the US exports a lot of food globally- China gets some $17b worth. Those tend to be perishable, so any hot war would have to be over quickly for China to come outahead, and any protracted war would see them need a new breadbasket eother domestic (reducing the industrial/military work pool), or international (which comes with the same risks they have now over US ties).

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Plus there’s no one saying you can’t reduce reliance on specific countries like China. It is indeed dangerous to rely on any one country for too much. But if you spread it out to many countries and make sure to have some domestic supply for the most important things it would be fine.

        At the moment Trump is targeting all countries, and many for no reason at all.