• MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No. There’s no telling what comes after these 4 years. The US has proven that they aren’t an ally worth relying on, we should look to more reliable partners and building them up and vice versa. Any concession or help offered by the next administration isn’t worth the paper it’s written on (just look at trump ripping up his own trade agreement for this nonsense.)

    We need allies not a neighbour that on a whim might try to throw us into a recession.

    • NotLemming@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      When the us comes crawling back we should make them pay reparations for any economic or other damages before they’re welcomed back.

    • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Exactly. With a Presidential Monarchy, no deal or treaty can be trusted past the next election (assuming they’ll still have those).

      More than more Trump, we are also seeing a complete abandonment of the US much vaunted system of checks and balances. You simply can’t deal with them except in 4 year periods.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      If you look back at the history of the US, it’s been fairly reliable in it’s first world alliances.

      • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah, they’ve pretty strongly turned from recent history though. No one in NATO believes the US could be trusted to uphold article 5 anymore. That’s the whole issue.

        Hell, why doesn’t Ukraine have the nuclear deterrnet that it had after the collapse of the Soviet Union? Because they foolishly believed American security promises, which were given in exchange for them releasing their nukes.

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Exactly. But it also shows it’s more about Trump than America.

          Plus we got other stuff to worry about, and playing nice with America is probably better in the long run.

          • MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What? Ukraine was first invaded before trump and then again without him there. In both cases, the security provided was less than what was originally guaranteed. Ukraine got screwed by believing America.

            It’s not just trump, there’s a whole Senate and Congress cheering him on. I would not gamble our future by relying on it to only be a trump phenomenon. If Americans had elected him once and horrified of their mistake, never came close again, that’d be one thing. But we has elected with a plurarlity of votes.

            America has proven an untrustworthy ally and that thwir promises aren’t worth the paper their written in.

            I don’t think Canada’s security should be “well, let’s just hope they don’t do it yet again!”