• Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s not about force or having authority to define something, this is about being able to have a real conversation, and you left the main term undefined except in your own mind, and then when I asked you for it you gave an absolutely wild definition that makes no sense and which I can’t find anybody else using, and yet you still called it “the” definition and not “your” definition.

    If nothing else that means you’re not someone it’s worth trying to talk to, because you’re not even trying to communicate effectively. I don’t care if you have your reasons, they’re not good reasons but I feel like in the spirit of this conversation I just shouldn’t fucking bother to explain why, because based on precedent you’ll just insist I’m wrong for your own inscrutable reasons and carry on as you were, and if I try to wrest those reasons out of you they’ll be nonsensical. Also you’re not worth trying to convince because you’re not somebody anyone else will listen to for long before they realise you’re completely full of shit.

    Goodbye.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Did you want to have an exchange about the practical and theoretical merits of a piece of terminology or did you want to be right.