• Guntrigger@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    All you’ve done here is prove that you’re ignorant. I suggest you look back and see that you’re arguing two different points with two different people as well as attributing words to me that I didn’t write.

    If you actually read my post, l already answered the difference. Everything you mentioned has widespread environmental impact, particularly if people/corporations use those materials in bad faith. Personal choice to smoke a cigarette is not equivalent to implanting a hazardous object into the environment. And I think you know that. If you honestly can’t see the difference, it’s willful ignorance.

    • Solar Bear@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right, I didn’t notice you were a different person.

      Everything you mentioned has widespread environmental impact, particularly if people/corporations use those materials in bad faith.

      There’s no greater environmental impact if a person chooses to insulate their own house with asbestos. My point still stands; draw me a clear distinction why a store can sell an individual person tobacco but not asbestos despite the fact that we know both cause long term lung damage.