• Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    Amab and afab are equivalent to biological male or female, just less explicit I suppose.

    Would you still argue that you are more biologically female than male if you considered that your DNA in every bit of your body still has the male set of chromosome?

    I’m not arguing against you, more so arguing that the distinction doesnt much matter and could be argued either way. I’d rather just take someone’s word for it when they say who they are. Thats the whole point isnt it, acceptance?

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Just because someone is living this doesnt mean they have a full understanding of things. Skepticism is important, even more so from allies since they have the same goals.

        Just because a transphobe has said something doesnt mean someone else saying a similar thing has the same intent.

        I find it odd that this group thats trying so hard to stop being an out group, is one of the most aggressive at banning/labelling peolle and placing them into an out group.

    • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Amab and afab are equivalent to biological male or female, just less explicit I suppose.

      That’s the point: They are not! Any sensible interpretation of a biological sex has to look at the whole system and we have comprehensively proven that biological sex can be changed. It’s a spectrum to begin with. Refusing that is like refusing that irrational numbers exist and claiming that every number can be written as a fraction: Understandable if you subject-matter education ends in 7th grade, but not if you actually looked into somewhat deeper at all.

      Would you still argue that you are more biologically female than male if you considered that your DNA in every bit of your body still has the male set of chromosome?

      For starters, define male set of chromosomes. If you say XY, then you will be interested to learn about De-la-Chapelle-Syndrom and Complete androgen insensitivity syndrome.

      But even if we put that aside, the thing is: Chromosomes really don’t matter all that much. The relevant differences primarily lie with organs and hormone-levels. Now, there are things you can do with gene-therapy (there was for example that trans girl who used CRISPR on herself to get her testicles to produce E instead of T). So it’s not that they don’t play any role at all anymore when you are an adult, but what matters much more is the overall metabolism and HRT is absolutely capable of switching that around.

      Like: Name the difference between a post-op transwoman and a cis woman who received a radical hysterectomy. Their metabolisms are functionally identical and both will have to substitute the same amount of Estradiol, because both lack ovaries. Chromosomes really don’t affect anything here, so insisting that they create a biological distinction, when they clearly don’t have any effect anymore is completely arbitrary.

      I’m not arguing against you, more so arguing that the distinction doesnt much matter and could be argued either way. I’d rather just take someone’s word for it when they say who they are. Thats the whole point isnt it, acceptance?

      The thing is: That is about accepting someone’s gender, which is usually indeed the more important thing.

      But biological sex of course also exists and the important thing for many of us is that it can in fact be changed and the claim that it can’t is deeply problematic and harmful.