Summary

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to connect with low-income workers due to a perceived lack of listening, according to AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US.

While union members largely supported Harris, many low-income voters backed Trump, swayed by his messaging on economic insecurity.

Despite Biden’s pro-labor policies, including infrastructure investments, the AFL-CIO now faces challenges under a likely Trump presidency.

AFL-CIO emphasized labor unions’ resilience and commitment to fighting rollbacks while advancing organizing efforts.

With public approval for unions at a near 60-year high, the labor movement plans both defensive and offensive strategies to protect workers.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    That’s not the message working people heard. They heard, “we are the establishment whose theories have been fucking you over for fifty years, but in our infinite wisdom and benevolence we have decided to make some changes that WE have determined will make your lives better, and so you must vote for us. After all, we are your intellectual superiors.”

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They need to find a way to silence the Republicans, then. They need to ensure that people are only getting the right message.

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This is why Republicans are attacking education, pressuring news companies into only presenting them positively and attacking their opposition (“here’s why Biden’s successes are bad for Biden”), attacking tech companies to pressure them into allowing their disinformation to spread, etc. They’re “playing the refs”.

    • Narwhalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes. Incredibly theoretical, difficult to understand, highly abstract plans like “raising the national minimum wage”.

      • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Wrong plans, they’re referring to the joke ‘50k small business loan with a bajillion strings attached’, ‘a maybe tax hike for the wealthy, but no transfer to middle/lower income’, ‘here are two tax credits half of which only impact parents and together dont break even on inflation’, ‘absolute refusal to commit to keeping khan’, in short dems to working Americans: fuck you, and here’s some genocide on top. Vote for us because we think we’re the only option.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Yes. Incredibly theoretical, difficult to understand, highly abstract plans like “raising the national minimum wage”.

        Gee. Can’t imagine why they didn’t have any fucking credibility on that one.

        Thumbs down, curtsy

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The theories I’m talking about are neoliberal theories, they are the theories that essentially all economic policies have been based on for the majority of time most of us have been alive. Even if the establishment has recently decided to embrace some changes, you can’t expect people to just forget the last fifty years or so.