• SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It won’t even save 30k a year, the mass majority of our deaths via guns are suicides. Removing that avenue is not going to magically make someone less suicidal.

    • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I believe guns increase the likelihood of suicide. There was a study on this, and lately firearm instructors have been conveying(in Utah at least) that removing guns from your home if suicidal is crucial. And to watch for signs of depression in other gun owners.

      But I agree with your overall point. Removing the guns won’t eliminate those suicide deaths, only reduce them.

      And more to my point, if RFK is in power when bird flu achieves human to human transmission, gun deaths will be background noise.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The issue with that logic is correlation doesn’t equal causation…you just need to look at japan. The country with pretty much the hardest gun control, has one of the highest suicide rates in the world.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The point you’re missing is if Japan had lax gun laws they would have more suicides. Not sure if you’re slow to catch on or just obstinate.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That’s not how correlation works at all. By that same logic you’re stating that without guns here, then all of our suicides by firearms wouldn’t happen at all, and people wouldn’t try something else.