The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 days agoThe grand prizelemmy.worldimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up1950arrow-down16
arrow-up1944arrow-down1imageThe grand prizelemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 19 days agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squareweker01@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-218 days agoThat is… surprisingly little. Are you sure?
minus-squareJiggle_Physics@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·18 days agoI mean, I can only estimate it’s size from the person standing next to it. From there I can use that estimate to get the volume of the cube, then the weight, then look up the cost by weight right now and apply the average. So it would be somewhere around 1mm by weight.
minus-squareAlwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days agoBy weight probably, for it to be a perfectly symmetrical cube would likely cost you double that.
That is… surprisingly little. Are you sure?
I mean, I can only estimate it’s size from the person standing next to it. From there I can use that estimate to get the volume of the cube, then the weight, then look up the cost by weight right now and apply the average.
So it would be somewhere around 1mm by weight.
By weight probably, for it to be a perfectly symmetrical cube would likely cost you double that.