• CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Was my statement wrong in any way?

    Do you know how analogies work? Of course the two things I compared are different.

    That doesn’t answer my question as to if my statement was incorrect.

    You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

    Just like saying “a fish swimming is like a bird flying” isn’t an argument that a bird would be able to fly underwater, saying “I’ve never been in an accident and still wear a seatbelt” is not an argument for “always have a deadly weapon on you when you leave the house” not being evidence of a completely fucked up situation.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      You’ve made an analogy about preparedness and let the assumption hang that that makes both things equal.

      No. It doesn’t do that at all. Nothing in my comment should be construed as to equate the wearing of seat belts and the carrying of firearms. They are different things, meant for different purposes, with different consequences for their misuse.

      The analogy demonstrated ways in which they are the same - having it and not needing it is usually what happens and needing it and not having it can be very bad.

      Edit: Y’all think Eliza Fletcher would have been better off carrying that day?

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So completely irrelevant to the topic that “Needing to have a gun on you just to be prepared for your day is fucked up.”

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Okay, sure. I wish people didn’t steal, kill, and rape too but it happens. Just the reality.