• davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    Different kernel. 95 was still DOS based. I believe a significant amount of stuff (especially drivers of course) which worked on one side didn’t work on the other.

    XP was the “merger” - the first NT based system for the consumer market.

    • Nougat@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      XP was the “merger” - the first NT based system for the consumer market.

      You’re thinking of Windows 2000. Win2K was released before Windows ME, and was widely sold on consumer market computers. When ME came out, and was pretty terrible, Win2K remained as the popular consumer option.

      • davidgro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of people did use it on home computers (myself included) but the target was still businesses. XP had TV ads and colorful themes, and all that, while Windows 2000… Didn’t. (Well maybe on C-SPAN or something) And the most basic (major) edition was “Professional” instead of something like “Home” as XP had.

        I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the big box computer makers did ship with it to home users, but it wasn’t “meant” for them.

        • Nougat@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh sure - the intent was for it to be a business-centric OS, it definitely was not flashy, but it was just so much better than 9x that plenty of computer makers made it available, and lots of people chose it over 98SE.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The googles tells me that Win2K was released Feb 17, 2000, and that ME was released Sep 14, 2000. Plenty of time for word to get out about how much better 2000 was than 9x even for home use.

            • 9point6@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah but in reality that wasn’t entirely the case, direct X compatible drivers were a big sticking point basically until XP came along. Windows 2000 was fantastic as a productivity OS, but it wasn’t fully there for the home user yet

              • Nougat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I do recall that for some heavier (in 2000 lol) gaming, people stuck with 9x for a while longer, until better gaming support for 2K came around at least.

            • elscallr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was also a lot more expensive than Windows 9x/me, so most consumer desktops went that way. The only people running 2000 were professionals and nerds that weren’t running Linux.