ā€œJill Stein is a useful idiot for Russia. After parroting Kremlin talking points and being propped up by bad actors in 2016 sheā€™s at it again,ā€ DNC spokesman Matt Corridoni said in a statement toĀ The Bulwark. ā€œJill Stein wonā€™t become president, but her spoiler candidacyā€”that both the GOP and Putin have previously shown interest inā€”can help decide who wins. A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump.ā€

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      Ā·
      3 months ago

      As someone in a state where my presidential vote is very much decidedā€¦ I voted Gary Johnson in 2016. I know there are a lot of very real critiques of the libertarian party and/or platform, but itā€™s really sad the green party puts it to shameā€¦ itā€™s not a high bar.

      My point beingā€¦ wtf is she still doing doing this stuff? Libertarians push local candidates all the damn time, and make a push for the presidential seat when they can, but soundly rejected Trump, and hell, even in 2016 you had the VP libertarian cantidate saying ā€œvote Hillaryā€. Like I am upset as anyone else, but if youā€™re still in the green party youā€™re just kidding yourselfā€¦ and thats from a freaking libertarian that hates his party a good 50% of the time.

        • batmaniam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          3 months ago

          Lol. I get it. Iā€™ve said it before and Iā€™ll say it a million more times Iā€™m sure: itā€™s got a lot of problems, but I like the framework the NAP provides. Itā€™s explicit and provides a place to work from.

          Theyā€™re not all crazy ā€œpublic roads are theftā€ folks. And again, remember the party soundly rejected trump. IME a lot of libertarians are generally supportive of social programs, so long as theyā€™re egalitarian.

          But what really rustles jimmies is the cut and dry stuff. I will never be able to get over democrats being on the wrong side of gay marriage, even in the name of pragmatism. Iā€™ll support them out of pragmatism, but Iā€™m bitter about it.

          But to the point of this thread: very little of that matters if thereā€™s not a next election. Iā€™ll take the party that fumbled gay marriage in the late 2000s VS. The one that wants to kill my friends 1000/10 times.

          And again to the point of this thread: itā€™s telling, and gives me faith in my party, there is no ā€œGarry Johnsonā€ this year.