• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    No. His MURDER of a person was in a public place, he didn’t have a carry permit, was not the owner of the firearm used because he was too young to be a registered owner, and he transferred said weapon across state lines.

    So, No…what he did was not legal. He just got off because of the jury. Big fucking difference, asshole.

    • UmeU@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      He got off because of an overly ambitious prosecution. Had he been charged appropriately, with second degree non premeditated, he would have been found guilty.

      He was only charged with first degree premeditated, and because the prosecution had no way to prove that this idiot kid intended to kill when he traveled to the area, the jury had no choice but to find him not guilty.

      The prosecutor is at fault, not the jury.