• volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My response is angry because I’m Spanish, so I have good reference of what fascism is like, and you saying that it can be categorised as leftist when it’s literally a reactionary movement that defends capitalist elites against rising leftist movements, is extremely apologetic of fascism.

    The current government of China and Maoism you can argue is both left wing and fascist

    Please tell me where’s the militarisation of society. Please tell me where’s the hierarchization of society. Please tell me where’s the adoration of the distant idealized past. Please tell me where the anti-communist reactionaries are.

    slow genocides against non Han Chinese ethnic groups, such as the Uyghurs.

    “Genocide is when reeducation camps for 3-4 years as a response to domestic terrorism”. Sorry mate, 4 years ago people bought this rhetoric. Now that people see what actual genocide and apartheid looks like (Palestine), and now that it’s patently obvious that a few anonymous testimonies aren’t a reliable source of information for such serious accusations, people don’t actually defend that there was genocide. There’s no genocide in China against Uyghur.

    • cristo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Esperanto
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      The militarization of society is not a marker of every form of facism, facism comes in many different flavors. Neither is hierarchization of society, that has existed in all forms social organization including communism, socialism, feudalism, etc. China does have a meritocratic system, exactly like the rest of the world for the most part. Another example of this could be the caste system of India, although I am not as familiar with that as I am with Chinese history and politics, so it is hard for me to make the fascist determination; although it does have the markers. Now for the adoration of the distant past, that is also not a marker of fascism, more so a marker of conservatism, but I will humor you. Have you heard of something called Shen Yun? It is an organization that puts on plays around the western world that focuses on glorifying the past of China prior to communism. It is no longer really supported by the CCP because of political disagreements, but is still a glorification of the past. Come on, dont say that fascism requires anti communism, thats just close minded and anti nuance. You need to look at fascism separately from the economic organizations of society: communism, socialism, capitalism. As for your point on the Uyghurs, if you think that rounding up an ethnic group and putting them in re-education, forced reproduction, and prison camps is not genocide, I dont know what to tell you. There were also hundreds more ethnic groups in China that have been culturally and literally genocided in recent history. We agree that Israels government is organized into a fascist apartheid state, Palestine is under a true attempted genocide. That doesnt mean, though, you should ignore what is happening and has happened in societies that are not strictly capitalist.

      • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The militarization of society is not a marker of every form of facism, facism comes in many different flavors

        Now for the adoration of the distant past, that is also not a marker of fascism

        Come on, dont say that fascism requires anti communism

        You can just say “I’m using my own definition of fascism which doesn’t agree with the general consensus of what fascism is, to refer to any regime I consider loosely authoritarian”.

        You need to look at fascism separately from the economic organizations of society

        “You need to look at the socioeconomic system separately from the economic organizations of society”. Fucking lol.

        As for your point on the Uyghurs, if you think that rounding up an ethnic group and putting them in re-education

        Agreed, that’s very sus and not a policy I support, even in the context of prior terrorist attacks.

        forced reproduction, and prison camps

        I assume you mean forced sterilization. Sorry, but there’s no serious evidence for that. The best you can point to is an inform by Amnesty International that is based off anonymous interviews. There’s nothing pointing towards mass forced sterilisation of Uyghur people, in fact they were mostly left out of the single-child policy that China adopted unlike Han people, which explains partly why Uyghur went from being a minority to the majority ethnicity in Xinjiang. What a weird genocide, where the supposedly oppressive ethnicity is displaced in numbers by the supposedly oppressed ethnicity.

        There were also hundreds more ethnic groups in China that have been culturally and literally genocided in recent history

        I’d love to read on that, can you send me a source?

        That doesnt mean, though, you should ignore what is happening and has happened in societies that are not strictly capitalist

        I’m not ignoring it, I’m looking at the available evidence and determining that there’s no active genocide. It’s these types of false claims that were used to justify military intervention in other countries. Remember Nayirah’s testimony used to justify in the US military action against Iraq. Or the exaggerated calls of genocide in Yugoslavia that were used to allow NATO to bomb the shit out of it and break it up into a collection of weak states, separating families.

        • cristo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          Esperanto
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I believe you are misunderstanding a lot of what I am writing. And I don’t think much of your reply to my comment has been constructive or an attempt to retort any of my opinion, just a “lol ur wrong” statement on all of it which in no way proves you right or me wrong. I am not using my own definition of fascism, if you read what I wrote, I am saying that what you are asking me to find in modern chinese society is not a marker of every form of fascism, and to quantify fascism by only those parameters is distracting from every other form of fascism that has been present in history. Its possible to be fascist and communist at the same time, its possible to be fascist and capitalist at the same time.

          • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah no, I’m not misunderstanding. And no, I’m not doing a constructive answer because you’re keen on talking about a definition of fascism that most people would disagree with, especially those who’ve spent a minute researching the origins of fascism and why it’s an intrinsically reactionary movement that pops as a response from capitalism to threatening leftist movements.