• timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    If you go far enough on the left sector then yes, they may say they want to “ensure the working class needs” but are so full of shit that they strike down anything that differs slightly from their views. We need part of a personal incentive and an individual focused economy to actually meet the needs of the people. Communism might just ensure the bare minimum. Degrowth might be what would be good for our planet but in no world do I see the majority of people willing to give up part of their purchasing power so its easier to push for a more green economy without degrowth.

    • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Degrowth might be what would be good for our planet but in no world do I see the majority of people willing to give up part of their purchasing power so its easier to push for a more green economy without degrowth.

      Thank you for agreeing with my point that self-described leftists don’t want to experience the consequences of ensuring everyone’s needs are met.

      We need part of a personal incentive

      Communism isn’t against that. The USSR workers had salaries tied to their productivity more often than in the west, I literally don’t know any worker in my capitalist country whose salary is increased if they increase their productivity. If by “incentive” you mean “the looming threat of unemployment and homelessness”, then speak openly. How funny that people aren’t willing to give up purchase power according to you, but the threat of unemployment is an adequate incentive.

      and an individual focused economy to actually meet the needs of the people.

      The needs of the people in developed capitalist societies are best met in socialized services such as public education, public healthcare, and public pensions. Typically, it’s individual-based (i.e. private) sectors of the economy like housing (or healthcare and education in the US) that give the worst crises and stress to people, and the ones that ensure highest inequality between rich and poor.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Communism isn’t against that. The USSR workers had salaries tied to their productivity more often than in the west, I literally don’t know any worker in my capitalist country whose salary is increased if they increase their productivity.

        It might seem abstract to you but if you are valuable to the company and another company offers you more money your pay is adjusted based on your economic productivity

        If by “incentive” you mean “the looming threat of unemployment and homelessness”, then speak openly. How funny that people aren’t willing to give up purchase power according to you, but the threat of unemployment is an adequate incentive.

        Why should I speak openly if I support a social safety net that ensures a basic standard of living and housing during times of unemployment?

        None of this needs a communist state

        • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          and another company offers you more money your pay is adjusted based on your economic productivity

          Meritocracy in capitalism is a myth. Low-wage workers often work harder than anyone else, and get no rises or other jobs for doing so.

          Why should I speak openly if I support a social safety net that ensures a basic standard of living and housing during times of unemployment?

          None of this needs a communist state

          Sure, the capitalist west is doing so well electing the far right to erode our already-eroded social rights even more.

          • timestatic@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Its not about how hard you work tho. Its based on how much your work is worth to others and how replaceable you a company. Actually Finland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark are some of the happiest countries on earth with the highest standards of living so I’d say they’re doing pretty well. I know that there are a lot worse capitalist countries but I specifically focus on a social market economy and the potential. I am not defending the lack of social welfare in the US.

            • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Nordic European countries have rather decent social welfare, agreed, but their economy is as sustained on unequal exchange as those of the rest of the developed world. In the case of Norway arguably more since they’re oil exporters. My point being, not every country, not even most countries, can be like Scandinavian countries because they rely on exploitation of people outside their borders.

              Its not about how hard you work tho. Its based on how much your work is worth to others and how replaceable you a company.

              How’s that not a bad thing to reward people based on? We saw during the pandemic that the actually important jobs in our society are the ones that pay jackshit and are easily replaceable. Shouldn’t these people get a better life?

              • timestatic@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I get your point. It’s sad that for example football stars get millions a year while the people required to run a country don’t get a good pay. But large parts of a society for example highly value those stars which is why they’re so well-paid.

                How’s that not a bad thing to reward people based on?

                In an ideal world we could do that, but only because you put a lot of effort into something doesn’t mean it is of higher value to society. If its standard stuff someone else could do or you just aren’t better than many others you don’t get valued as much. If everyone worked the same job (Its a ridiculous example, I know but stick with it one second) and worked their ass off it would just be nearly worthless since all the other jobs would be empty. Thats how the economy allocates the work force.

                Nordic European countries have rather decent social welfare, agreed, but their economy is as sustained on unequal exchange as those of the rest of the developed world. In the case of Norway arguably more since they’re oil exporters. My point being, not every country, not even most countries, can be like Scandinavian countries because they rely on exploitation of people outside their borders.

                This might be true, but even more industrialized countries like Germany or the Netherlands have a decent welfare state. They export a lot as well, yes, but I don’t see it as much of an issue if the other countries were more industrialized and had higher pr capita productivity which would leave more things for everyone involved.

                • volodya_ilich@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  In an ideal world we could do that, but only because you put a lot of effort into something doesn’t mean it is of higher value to society

                  Again, ESSENTIAL jobs during the pandemic. They are the ones of highest value to society, to the point that it would crash without them.

                  If its standard stuff someone else could do or you just aren’t better than many others you don’t get valued as much

                  I’m fully aware that’s how it works now, I argue that it shouldn’t be like this.

                  This might be true, but even more industrialized countries like Germany or the Netherlands have a decent welfare state. They export a lot as well, yes, but I don’t see it as much of an issue if the other countries were more industrialized and had higher pr capita productivity which would leave more things for everyone involved.

                  Again, that’s not how it works. If you allow currently poor countries to develop, they’ll stop providing cheap labor and raw materials to wealthy countries, and stop buying expensive manufactured products like cars and planes at a premium. That’s what the western welfare state relies on: exploitation through unequal exchange of the poorer regions of the world

                  • timestatic@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    Again, that’s not how it works. If you allow currently poor countries to develop, they’ll stop providing cheap labor and raw materials to wealthy countries, and stop buying expensive manufactured products like cars and planes at a premium. That’s what the western welfare state relies on: exploitation through unequal exchange of the poorer regions of the world

                    I don’t agree with that assessment. I believe that the amount of manual labor and cheap outsourcing isn’t needed for wealth. I believe we could all increase our standards of living