• ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                I don’t get it.
                Are you replying to “Except fun fact…no.” - u/Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
                Or to my reply to it, that implies, maybe their renderer is non-standard and causing the backslashes to not work.

                \>\>:| --> >>:| works pretty well for me.

                • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  this is a whole mess of confusion and miscommunication that probably absolutely no one cares about, and I for one am happy to just watch

                  • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    I see, so the confusion is about whether u/Pyro@Programming.dev intended the double eyebrow or they made a mistake with that and are being corrected for it.

                    I thought they wanted the double eyebrow, because why would you put 2 if you only wanted one? And if you wanted the “quote” option, you would just not escape the leftmost “>”.


                    In case my above words are more confusing, Yes, it shows up as 2 sets of eyebrows for me too.
                    I thought that’s what the Thread Starter wanted.

                    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0