• Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’d also add my speculation that the repubs want biden to stay in, as he’s their best shot at winning.

    Anyone else would be an unknown, and I think would be positive.

      • confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        How? No one wants to vote for him. We are all voting for “Not Trump”. Someone that people want to vote for who isn’t Trump should perform better.

        • UsernameHere@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Everyone I know is happy to vote for him. This idea of changing candidates is only being pushed online right now as far as I can see. Pretty convenient timing too.

          • confusedbytheBasics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s been the narrative in my world for ages. My friends all joined the write in campaign for ‘uncommitted’ during the primary hoping we could send a message to the DNC. My social media outside lemmy is full of rants about not wanting to vote for Biden and anger at being forced to in order to avoid Trump. The mood is somber, almost depressed, we are talking like the election is already over and how to best protect people from a Trump admin.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                It’s relevant because that is what you are using. It sure as hell isn’t logic or data.

                'Improperly collected data failed us once, so it always will" is literally the same thing as what you are saying.

                It ignores any changes in methodology that occurred in 8 years. It ignores identified biases that have been removed.

                It’s literally am anti-science point of view.

                E.g. your gut. It sure as hell isn’t coming from your brain.

      • Tedrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’ve seen you say that a few times here but haven’t seen an argument. I’m just curious, why do you think that?

        • UsernameHere@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          He beat Trump once. He’s the incumbent. Changing this late in the game is going to cause a clusterfuck so bad that it would guarantee Trump’s win.

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            He beat donnie 4 years ago. He’s not the same man. Also, Covid is not in the same state as it was. And he didn’t have to fight against the (admittedly mostly false) narrative about inflation and so on.

            Something like 2/3 of Democrats want him to bow out. Why won’t he take that advice and end it now, before he completely soils his decades-long legacy of service?