Key quote:

Bidenā€™s defiance against calls for him to leave the presidential campaign after last monthā€™s debate have only worsened his chances in November, Cook Editor-in-Chief Amy Walter wrote.

ā€œBiden was losing pre-debate. Now, heā€™s losing by a bit more,ā€ she said, adding that the possibility Biden leaves the race at this point is ā€œremote.ā€

Citing postdebate polling, Cook announced it will move Minnesota, New Hampshire and Nebraskaā€™s 2nd Congressional District from ā€œLikely Democraticā€ to ā€œLean Democratic.ā€ The group also moved Nevada, Arizona and Georgia from ā€œTossupā€ to ā€œLean Republican.ā€

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    Ā·
    4 months ago

    Believe me, no one is burying their heads in the sand. The NY Times just spent like two weeks covering nothing but Bidenā€™s age. I had to scroll down like 1500px to find the fucking French election results and Iā€™m not even sure they bothered to send someone to cover the hurricane that wrecked multiple countries and hit one of the most populous regions of the country.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      If you believe this is the most important election in our lifetimes and believe the polls and analysis that put Biden in a bad and worsening position, itā€™s kind of the most important story in the country, if not the world. Thereā€™s a reason itā€™s like a 50% of all political discussions here.

      • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        4 months ago

        Itā€™s an important story! But The NY Times has beclowned itself by trying to create a narrative instead of just covering it. There were well over 200 articles and 99% were gossip or fanfiction masquerading as news stories. Thatā€™s an editorial decision, not a news-based one. They even made a whole graphic counting which Democrats have defected. (It was 6 house members and 0 Senators and governors.)

        It kind of reminded me of when they kept writing articles saying the president of MIT still hasnā€™t resigned even though that was an utterly unimportant story. Just a bunch of articles about nothing happening.