• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I think the implication is that “angry gay” is a distinct category with traits that aren’t purely the result of being angry or being gay.

    Also I think people get way too hung up on the idea that being “normal” is good, so not being normal must be bad. Since that probably can’t be fixed, I think it’s better to use the word “typical” instead of normal because it’s not so loaded.