• hypnoton@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I agree with just about everything you say, but I have one question:

    And all it would take to motivate the base - to get Democrats enthused in a way that they haven’t been since 2008 - is to throw open the nomination. That would bring the race a sense of excitement and hope that hasn’t just been missing since the debate, but all along.

    What do you mean by “throw open,” exactly?

    I would love a real second primary with an array of candidates not all of whom were preselected by the billionaires. And a large inclusive debate or two. Is that what you are suggesting?

    Or maybe you mean let the billionaires and their purchased Dem elites make a selection for us in a smoke filled room behind closed doors?

    • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      I would love a real second primary with an array of candidates not all of whom were preselected by the billionaires. And a large inclusive debate or two. Is that what you are suggesting?

      Yes.

      Sorry - I thought “throw open” was a commonly understood phrase.

      It means to open something suddenly and completely - no incremental stages and no limitations - just immediately from closed to fully and completely open.

      • hypnoton@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I know what the phrase means but I didn’t dare to believe such an optimistic soul could exist. You proved my doubts were unwarranted.

        Very cool, and I support your idea 120%! I believe it is possible because the DNC just routinely makes up rules on the go, so nothing’s stopping them from opening a second primary. I would be super interested if it were a truly open and a properly democratic primary.