• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lmao what the fuck? That’s an objectively stupid and unprofitable move, even in a purely capitalistic sense. No sane stockholder should vote to hand any one person that amount of money.

    • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’ve read plausible explanations that when your company is a meme stock, you need the thing that makes it a meme to stay around lest the price fall to reasonable levels dictated by market demand.

      In other words they gotta give him the money or else the fanbois will stop pumping up the price.

      • paysrenttobirds@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Pretty much:

        switched its vote “given the strong alignment of executive pay with shareholder returns since 2018 and the benefits the board asserted related to the motivational value for the CEO in preserving the original deal.” Vanguard also voted to allow Musk to relocate the company from Delaware (which is the site of a big lawsuit about Musk’s pay) to Texas.

    • psmgx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      IIRC most of the proxy voting firms like Glass Lewis and ISS tell the ETF types to vote in favor of mgmt. Because reasons, apparently

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    Headline:

    You Probably Unwittingly Voted to Give Elon Musk a Huge Raise

    Article:

    If you are privileged enough to have a 401(k), an IRA, or any sort of investment account

    I am so not privileged, so I guess the one bonus to that is I didn’t give Elon a raise.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Don’t look at me. I contacted my fund managers at Fidelity and let my concerns be heard. They also voted yes.

    I’m not gonna stop running my 401k, I’m on track for my retirement. I have to allow this fucknugget to run the company into the ground because the stock market is detached from actual wealth, and his meme stock is unironically paying for my future (until its not, which could be any day now). This fucking sucks, man!

  • golli@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Didn’t they actually vote against the compensation package when it was originally proposed? I’d really like to hear a more indepth reason on why they changed their vote now.

    There is no way he is worth this kind of money for the future, so the only reason to vote yes imo is if they’d expect a court to uphold it, if denied, and that legal fights would be to costly. But with this sum at stake I’d take those chances.