jeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 23 days agoSupreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor case that could hinder government’s ability to intervene in some unionization disputestheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down11
arrow-up1172arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor case that could hinder government’s ability to intervene in some unionization disputestheconversation.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 23 days agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squaredrdiddlybadger@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up72·23 days agoI’m sorry but SCOTUS has decided we get to go back to the old ways of labor disputes.
minus-squareIrremarkable@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up19·23 days agoI know which side I’m on, that’s for damn sure
minus-squarekora@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·23 days agoWhile we’re at it, lets go ahead and yeet the system as a whole.
minus-squareroofuskit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·22 days agoYou mean when they called in the army to gun us down?
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·22 days agoAnd we shoot back. Yes the class war
I’m sorry but SCOTUS has decided we get to go back to the old ways of labor disputes.
To shreds, you say?
I know which side I’m on, that’s for damn sure
While we’re at it, lets go ahead and yeet the system as a whole.
You mean when they called in the army to gun us down?
And we shoot back. Yes the class war