The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

  • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I ask because you seem to have a very different definition of what socialism is from me because everything you’re describing is just social welfare. For example, I an Anarchist (syndicalist, if you want to get technical), could be considered a ‘socialist’ as my ideology would have governance under a federation of industrial unions. No president, no electroeal college, no leaderism. I ask again, what do you consider “socialism” to be?

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      That sounds like it would end up being a plutocracy within the first generation. Unions are great for workers, but they aren’t a magical solution for government.

      • PorkRoll@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Industrial Unions aren’t the same as trade unions. I’d recommend looking into the IWW as (pretty much the only) example of this.