The move would extend her 36-year House career and continue to freeze her would-be California successors in a long-standing holding pattern.

  • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are zero politicians who don’t own stock. I really don’t understand why she’s held to some special standard on this specific issue

    • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Holding stock: not a problem

      Having your husband trade stock specifically to exploit ethics rules grey-areas: Problem.

      Hopefully now you understand why it’s a problem, and should note that she’s not alone on this, just a poster-senior for it.