• AIhasUse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Those managers you are referring to are the current system. The way we elect who has the power is with our money. If you want Samsung to make choices about resources, you buy Samsung devices or stock. This is the fairest voting system we’ve managed to create.

    Thanks for the link. I agree with your assessment of where prices come from. Eventually, robots will drive the costs down to nothing.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is not how our current system works, because you assume Samsung has no outsized agency and that people have a plethora of chocies.

      If you have any questions about WLaC, I can answer for you.

      • AIhasUse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        There may not be a plethora of really good tech companies to choose from, but we also have the choice to not vote for any of them. Fact of the matter is that people selfishly prefer to support these companies in their mission to get better and better than the competition, making their be fewer and fewer really good tech companies to choose from.

        What is WLaC?

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Monopolization is not due to consumers, who must participate in the system, it is due to Capitalists accumulating.

          It’s an abbreviation of Wage Labor and Capital.