• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The 2nd Amendment clearly says that the right to own guns can’t be restricted and they passed legislation restricting it.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, the 2nd Amendment clearly says that the right to own guns is for the purpose of a well-regulated militia. The courts are the ones who interpreted that to mean every citizen [1, Heller]. And the courts also are the ones who have afforded such State restriction legislation as being Constitutional [1, Cruikshank].

      In any case, it would likely require an amendment to the Constitution to directly change the qualifications for being President.

      [1] - https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/gun-rights/

        • ulkesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          It would certainly be challenged at the Supreme Court, so there would be a ruling at some point at that level. Whether or not the Court would affirm such a law, I don’t know. But, while highly unlikely every state would do this, it is not unprecedented that every state could enact the same or similar laws (the one that comes to mind is seat belt law, but New Hampshire is still a holdout, for some reason).